kraken/table.md

| Command | Mean [ms] | Min [ms] | Max [ms] | Relative |
|:---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
| `echo 30 \| wasmtime ./fib_compiled.wasm` | 107.5 ± 2.2 | 105.6 | 116.4 | 9.33 ± 0.51 |
| `echo 30 \| wasmtime ./fib_compiled_let.wasm` | 469.3 ± 3.1 | 464.3 | 474.2 | 40.74 ± 2.08 |
| `echo 30 \| wasmtime ./builtin_fib.wasm` | 11.5 ± 0.6 | 10.4 | 14.3 | 1.00 |
| `echo 30 \| wasmtime ./fib_compiled_manual.wasm` | 292.5 ± 5.7 | 287.5 | 308.1 | 25.39 ± 1.38 |
| `scheme --script ./fib.scm 30` | 54.6 ± 1.4 | 52.8 | 60.1 | 4.74 ± 0.27 |
| `scheme --script ./fib_let.scm 30` | 53.7 ± 0.9 | 52.2 | 55.9 | 4.67 ± 0.25 |
| `python3 ./fib.py 30` | 291.7 ± 3.7 | 286.0 | 296.9 | 25.32 ± 1.32 |
| `python3 ./fib_let.py 30` | 303.7 ± 4.2 | 293.7 | 308.0 | 26.36 ± 1.38 |
| `echo 30 \| wasmtime ./rust_fib/target/wasm32-wasi/debug/rust_let.wasm` | 29.6 ± 0.6 | 28.4 | 31.6 | 2.57 ± 0.14 |
| `echo 30 \| wasmtime ./rust_fib/target/wasm32-wasi/release/rust_let.wasm` | 18.4 ± 0.5 | 17.3 | 20.0 | 1.59 ± 0.09 |
Change lapply to optionally take in an explicit env, make it optional for vapply so they match, then tweak Y such that it threads the dynamic env through, then implement eta-reduction in the compiler backend. This provides about the same speedup again from the Y elimination, as it's kinda the other half for fully getting rid of Y such that there's just static recursive calls. fib.kp went from 1.7 -> 1.1 -> 0.5, and fib_let similarly. fib.kp is now faster than fib_manual, but just by a bit. 2022-04-17 01:52:01 -04:00			`\| Command \| Mean [ms] \| Min [ms] \| Max [ms] \| Relative \|`
			`\|:---\|---:\|---:\|---:\|---:\|`
Ah, the remaining calls were to =. Added 'inlining' the = and comp_helper loop into repeated calls to comp_helper_helper, eliminating the param array overhead. Now fib only allocates 10 times (instead of 4 million), and runs in .107s, finally beating Python handilly and becoming about 2x as slow as Chez. Feels like a decent spot for now, and that was most all of the low hanging fruit. The only thing left now is inlining of user functions to get fib_let performing as well - it looks glacial now at .4s because of the 2 remaining closure calls that the let expands to 2022-04-21 01:09:10 -04:00			\| `echo 30 \\| wasmtime ./fib_compiled.wasm` \| 107.5 ± 2.2 \| 105.6 \| 116.4 \| 9.33 ± 0.51 \|
			\| `echo 30 \\| wasmtime ./fib_compiled_let.wasm` \| 469.3 ± 3.1 \| 464.3 \| 474.2 \| 40.74 ± 2.08 \|
			\| `echo 30 \\| wasmtime ./builtin_fib.wasm` \| 11.5 ± 0.6 \| 10.4 \| 14.3 \| 1.00 \|
			\| `echo 30 \\| wasmtime ./fib_compiled_manual.wasm` \| 292.5 ± 5.7 \| 287.5 \| 308.1 \| 25.39 ± 1.38 \|
			\| `scheme --script ./fib.scm 30` \| 54.6 ± 1.4 \| 52.8 \| 60.1 \| 4.74 ± 0.27 \|
			\| `scheme --script ./fib_let.scm 30` \| 53.7 ± 0.9 \| 52.2 \| 55.9 \| 4.67 ± 0.25 \|
			\| `python3 ./fib.py 30` \| 291.7 ± 3.7 \| 286.0 \| 296.9 \| 25.32 ± 1.32 \|
			\| `python3 ./fib_let.py 30` \| 303.7 ± 4.2 \| 293.7 \| 308.0 \| 26.36 ± 1.38 \|
			\| `echo 30 \\| wasmtime ./rust_fib/target/wasm32-wasi/debug/rust_let.wasm` \| 29.6 ± 0.6 \| 28.4 \| 31.6 \| 2.57 ± 0.14 \|
			\| `echo 30 \\| wasmtime ./rust_fib/target/wasm32-wasi/release/rust_let.wasm` \| 18.4 ± 0.5 \| 17.3 \| 20.0 \| 1.59 ± 0.09 \|