tests/test_map.expected_results

3
2
1
3
20
2
30
4
Lookie, a map!
What I get for not testing different types
key: 7, value: Lookie, a map!
key: 30, value: we'll look for for_each too
3
2
1
3
20
2
30
4
Lookie, a map!
What I get for not testing different types
key: 30, value: we'll look for for_each too
key: 7, value: Lookie, a map!
First run at a dead-simple map library. Writing this has reminded me of the need for a []= operator as well as automatic generation of functions for objects, which really should also include == 2015-06-27 10:04:09 -04:00			`3`
			`2`
			`1`
			`3`
			`20`
			`2`
Added the []= overloadable operator and implemented it for vector, map, and string 2015-06-27 11:46:31 -04:00			`30`
First run at a dead-simple map library. Writing this has reminded me of the need for a []= operator as well as automatic generation of functions for objects, which really should also include == 2015-06-27 10:04:09 -04:00			`4`
Fix my very very silly mistake of makeing keys and values the same type in map, also add a map.for_each function 2015-06-27 12:03:55 -04:00			`Lookie, a map!`
			`What I get for not testing different types`
			`key: 7, value: Lookie, a map!`
			`key: 30, value: we'll look for for_each too`
most of hash map - have to commit fix for unify type first 2016-04-20 16:09:26 -04:00			`3`
			`2`
			`1`
			`3`
			`20`
			`2`
			`30`
			`4`
			`Lookie, a map!`
			`What I get for not testing different types`
			`key: 30, value: we'll look for for_each too`
			`key: 7, value: Lookie, a map!`