miloignis/kraken
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
db7c258d399627f81a33b338a058fe89a30fe2c0
kraken/fib_tests.sh

22 lines
1.1 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

Add fib_let test and script to run all of them. Indeed, the version with the let is worse when interpreted and the same/better when partially-evaled and compiled
2022-03-20 16:01:38 -04:00
#!/usr/bin/env bash
Fixed a terrible bug where turns out I used the same name for a block and a parameter in the comparison meta-function - they share the same namespace in the wasm DSL, so when I used it like a parameter in a loop it resolved to the number of scopes between the statement and the block'th parameter which had the same type and the calculation worked fine, but it overwrote the parameter I thought wasn't being used and called a function later with. Also, that seemed like that last of the really bad leaks & corruption, so re-enabling the freelist and am able to run some less-trivial benchmarks, namely (fib 30)! The compiled version is between 4.7x and 65x slower than Python, depending on if you're using wasmer, wasmtime, wasm3. Would like to try WAVM as well. A solid place to start, I think, and hopefully we'll be faster than Python once I implement a variety of dont-be-dumb optimizations (real-er malloc, static calls of statically known functions, etc)
2022-03-29 23:49:51 -04:00
NUMBER=30
Round allocated blocks up to the nearest 8 words, and split blocks that are >= 2x needed number of words. Now only allocates 1 wasm page for both compiled and interpreted versions at fib 30, a 269-538x improvement!
2022-03-30 21:27:01 -04:00
#NUMBER=25
Add fib_let test and script to run all of them. Indeed, the version with the let is worse when interpreted and the same/better when partially-evaled and compiled
2022-03-20 16:01:38 -04:00
echo "Compile Straight"
Fixed a terrible bug where turns out I used the same name for a block and a parameter in the comparison meta-function - they share the same namespace in the wasm DSL, so when I used it like a parameter in a loop it resolved to the number of scopes between the statement and the block'th parameter which had the same type and the calculation worked fine, but it overwrote the parameter I thought wasn't being used and called a function later with. Also, that seemed like that last of the really bad leaks & corruption, so re-enabling the freelist and am able to run some less-trivial benchmarks, namely (fib 30)! The compiled version is between 4.7x and 65x slower than Python, depending on if you're using wasmer, wasmtime, wasm3. Would like to try WAVM as well. A solid place to start, I think, and hopefully we'll be faster than Python once I implement a variety of dont-be-dumb optimizations (real-er malloc, static calls of statically known functions, etc)
2022-03-29 23:49:51 -04:00
#touch csc_out.wasm && rm csc_out.wasm && scheme --script ./partial_eval.scm fib.kp && time echo $NUMBER | wasm3 ./csc_out.wasm
Round allocated blocks up to the nearest 8 words, and split blocks that are >= 2x needed number of words. Now only allocates 1 wasm page for both compiled and interpreted versions at fib 30, a 269-538x improvement!
2022-03-30 21:27:01 -04:00
touch csc_out.wasm && rm csc_out.wasm && scheme --script ./partial_eval.scm fib.kp && time echo $NUMBER | wasmtime ./csc_out.wasm
#touch csc_out.wasm && rm csc_out.wasm && scheme --script ./partial_eval.scm fib.kp && time echo $NUMBER | wasmer ./csc_out.wasm
Add fib_let test and script to run all of them. Indeed, the version with the let is worse when interpreted and the same/better when partially-evaled and compiled
2022-03-20 16:01:38 -04:00
Round allocated blocks up to the nearest 8 words, and split blocks that are >= 2x needed number of words. Now only allocates 1 wasm page for both compiled and interpreted versions at fib 30, a 269-538x improvement!
2022-03-30 21:27:01 -04:00
echo "Interpret Straight"
Fixed a terrible bug where turns out I used the same name for a block and a parameter in the comparison meta-function - they share the same namespace in the wasm DSL, so when I used it like a parameter in a loop it resolved to the number of scopes between the statement and the block'th parameter which had the same type and the calculation worked fine, but it overwrote the parameter I thought wasn't being used and called a function later with. Also, that seemed like that last of the really bad leaks & corruption, so re-enabling the freelist and am able to run some less-trivial benchmarks, namely (fib 30)! The compiled version is between 4.7x and 65x slower than Python, depending on if you're using wasmer, wasmtime, wasm3. Would like to try WAVM as well. A solid place to start, I think, and hopefully we'll be faster than Python once I implement a variety of dont-be-dumb optimizations (real-er malloc, static calls of statically known functions, etc)
2022-03-29 23:49:51 -04:00
#touch csc_out.wasm && rm csc_out.wasm && scheme --script ./partial_eval.scm fib.kp no_compile && time echo $NUMBER | wasm3 ./csc_out.wasm
Round allocated blocks up to the nearest 8 words, and split blocks that are >= 2x needed number of words. Now only allocates 1 wasm page for both compiled and interpreted versions at fib 30, a 269-538x improvement!
2022-03-30 21:27:01 -04:00
touch csc_out.wasm && rm csc_out.wasm && scheme --script ./partial_eval.scm fib.kp no_compile && time echo $NUMBER | wasmtime ./csc_out.wasm
Add fib_let test and script to run all of them. Indeed, the version with the let is worse when interpreted and the same/better when partially-evaled and compiled
2022-03-20 16:01:38 -04:00
Fixed a terrible bug where turns out I used the same name for a block and a parameter in the comparison meta-function - they share the same namespace in the wasm DSL, so when I used it like a parameter in a loop it resolved to the number of scopes between the statement and the block'th parameter which had the same type and the calculation worked fine, but it overwrote the parameter I thought wasn't being used and called a function later with. Also, that seemed like that last of the really bad leaks & corruption, so re-enabling the freelist and am able to run some less-trivial benchmarks, namely (fib 30)! The compiled version is between 4.7x and 65x slower than Python, depending on if you're using wasmer, wasmtime, wasm3. Would like to try WAVM as well. A solid place to start, I think, and hopefully we'll be faster than Python once I implement a variety of dont-be-dumb optimizations (real-er malloc, static calls of statically known functions, etc)
2022-03-29 23:49:51 -04:00
#echo "Compile Let"
#touch csc_out.wasm && rm csc_out.wasm && scheme --script ./partial_eval.scm fib_let.kp && time echo $NUMBER | wasm3 ./csc_out.wasm
Add fib_let test and script to run all of them. Indeed, the version with the let is worse when interpreted and the same/better when partially-evaled and compiled
2022-03-20 16:01:38 -04:00
Fixed a terrible bug where turns out I used the same name for a block and a parameter in the comparison meta-function - they share the same namespace in the wasm DSL, so when I used it like a parameter in a loop it resolved to the number of scopes between the statement and the block'th parameter which had the same type and the calculation worked fine, but it overwrote the parameter I thought wasn't being used and called a function later with. Also, that seemed like that last of the really bad leaks & corruption, so re-enabling the freelist and am able to run some less-trivial benchmarks, namely (fib 30)! The compiled version is between 4.7x and 65x slower than Python, depending on if you're using wasmer, wasmtime, wasm3. Would like to try WAVM as well. A solid place to start, I think, and hopefully we'll be faster than Python once I implement a variety of dont-be-dumb optimizations (real-er malloc, static calls of statically known functions, etc)
2022-03-29 23:49:51 -04:00
#echo "Interpret Let"
#touch csc_out.wasm && rm csc_out.wasm && scheme --script ./partial_eval.scm fib_let.kp no_compile && time echo $NUMBER | wasm3 ./csc_out.wasm
Add fib_let test and script to run all of them. Indeed, the version with the let is worse when interpreted and the same/better when partially-evaled and compiled
2022-03-20 16:01:38 -04:00
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink