First vau-involved partial evals working!
This commit is contained in:
@@ -47,6 +47,12 @@
|
||||
.env_marked (lambda (x) (idx x 1))
|
||||
.env_real (lambda (x) (idx x 2))
|
||||
|
||||
env-lookup-helper (rec-lambda recurse (dict key i fail success) (cond (and (= i (- (len dict)) 1) (= nil (idx dict i))) (fail)
|
||||
(= i (- (len dict) 1)) (recurse (idx (idx dict i) 1) key 0 fail success)
|
||||
(= key (idx (idx dict i) 0)) (success (idx (idx dict i) 1))
|
||||
true (recurse dict key (+ i 1) fail success)))
|
||||
env-lookup (lambda (env key) (env-lookup-helper (idx env 1) key 0 (lambda () (error (str key " not found in env " dict))) (lambda (x) x)))
|
||||
|
||||
strip (rec-lambda recurse (x)
|
||||
(cond (val? x) (.val x)
|
||||
(later? x) (.later x)
|
||||
@@ -65,8 +71,7 @@
|
||||
; partial_eval_helper always takes in unmarked expressions and makes marked ones, maintaining marked envs
|
||||
;
|
||||
; If indeed we have to keep track of non-primitive combinator values (which I think makes sense for stripping),
|
||||
; we'll have to continually keep a map
|
||||
; of values to their definition.
|
||||
; we'll have to continually keep a map of values to their definition (we do this now!).
|
||||
|
||||
partial_eval_helper (rec-lambda recurse (x env comb_to_mark_map)
|
||||
(cond (= x true) [comb_to_mark_map ['val true ]]
|
||||
@@ -74,18 +79,32 @@
|
||||
(env? x) (error "called partial_eval with an env " x)
|
||||
(combiner? x) (error "called partial_eval with a combiner, not yet supported (assuming just parsed symbols etc) " x)
|
||||
(string? x) [comb_to_mark_map ['val x]]
|
||||
(symbol? x) [comb_to_mark_map (get-value (.env_marked env) x)]
|
||||
(symbol? x) [comb_to_mark_map (env-lookup env x)]
|
||||
(int? x) [comb_to_mark_map ['val x]]
|
||||
(and (array? x) (= 0 (len x))) (error "Partial eval on empty array")
|
||||
(array? x) (let ( [comb_to_mark_map comb] (recurse (idx x 0) env comb_to_mark_map) )
|
||||
; it seems like even if it's later we should be able to eval some?
|
||||
; Maybe there should be something between 'later and 'comb made in vau
|
||||
; for those sorts of cases, but maybe it doesn't matter?
|
||||
(cond (later? comb) [comb_to_mark_map ['later x]]
|
||||
(prim_comb? comb) ((.prim_comb comb) env comb_to_mark_map (slice x 1 -1))
|
||||
(comb? comb) (let (
|
||||
[wrap_level de? se params body actual_function] (.comb comb)
|
||||
; Env will need special checking for escaping, including when contained inside of an array or other combinator
|
||||
; Actually, that extends to checking escaping for combinators in general, since they may close over laters
|
||||
;subs (map (lambda (y) (recurse y env comb_to_mark_map)) x)
|
||||
) [comb_to_mark_map ['later x]])
|
||||
[comb_to_mark_map appropriatly_evaled_params] ((rec-lambda param-recurse (wrap params comb_to_mark_map)
|
||||
(if (!= 0 wrap)
|
||||
(let ([comb_to_mark_map evaled_params]
|
||||
(foldl (lambda ([comb_to_mark_map ac] p)
|
||||
(let ([comb_to_mark_map p] (recurse p env comb_to_mark_map))
|
||||
[comb_to_mark_map (concat ac [p])]))
|
||||
[comb_to_mark_map []]
|
||||
params))
|
||||
(param-recurse (- wrap 1) evaled_params comb_to_mark_map))
|
||||
[comb_to_mark_map params])
|
||||
) wrap_level params comb_to_mark_map)
|
||||
de_entry (if (!= nil de?) [ [de? env] ]
|
||||
[])
|
||||
inner_env ['env (concat (zip params appropriatly_evaled_params) de_entry [se]) nil]
|
||||
) (recurse body inner_env comb_to_mark_map))
|
||||
true (error (str "Partial eval noticed that you will likely call not a function " x))))
|
||||
(nil? x) [comb_to_mark_map ['val x]]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -107,13 +126,38 @@
|
||||
handler (lambda (de comb_to_mark_map params) [comb_to_mark_map ['later (cons actual_function params)]])
|
||||
) [f_sym ['prim_comb handler actual_function]]))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
; Our job is made a lot easier by the fact that these will
|
||||
; all be stripped and we only care about symbols and things that could contain symbols,
|
||||
; namely arrays
|
||||
;
|
||||
; This is a conservative analysis, since we can't always tell what constructs introduce
|
||||
; a new binding scope & would be shadowing... we should at least be able to implement it for
|
||||
; vau/lambda, but we won't at first
|
||||
closes_over_outside_vars (rec-lambda recurse (env body) (cond
|
||||
(symbol? body) (env-lookup-helper (idx env 1) body 0 (lambda () false) (lambda (x) true))
|
||||
(array? body) (foldl (lambda (a x) (or a (recurse env x))) false body)
|
||||
true false))
|
||||
|
||||
root_marked_env ['env [
|
||||
; Ok, so for combinators, it should partial eval the body.
|
||||
; It should then check to see if the partial-evaled body has closed over
|
||||
; any 'later values from above the combinator. If so, the combinator should
|
||||
; evaluate to a ['later [vau de? params (strip partially_evaled_body)]], otherwise it can evaluate to a 'comb.
|
||||
; Note that this 'later may be re-evaluated later if the parent function is called.
|
||||
(give_up vau)
|
||||
;(give_up vau)
|
||||
['vau ['prim_comb (lambda (de comb_to_mark_map params) (let (
|
||||
de? (if (= 3 (len params)) (idx params 0))
|
||||
vau_de? (if (= nil de?) [] [de])
|
||||
vau_params (if (= nil de?) (idx params 0) (idx params 1))
|
||||
body (if (= nil de?) (idx params 1) (idx params 2))
|
||||
inner_env ['env (concat (map (lambda (p) [p ['later p]]) vau_params) (if (= nil de?) [] [ [de? ['later de?]] ]) [de]) nil]
|
||||
[comb_to_mark_map pe_body] (partial_eval_helper body inner_env comb_to_mark_map)
|
||||
spe_body (strip pe_body)
|
||||
) (if (or (= nil (.env_real de)) (closes_over_outside_vars de spe_body)) [comb_to_mark_map ['later (concat [vau] vau_de? [vau_params spe_body])]]
|
||||
[comb_to_mark_map ['comb 0 de? de vau_params spe_body
|
||||
(do (println "evaling (eval " (str (concat [vau] vau_de? [vau_params spe_body]) (.env_real de)) ")" ) (eval (concat [vau] vau_de? [vau_params spe_body]) (.env_real de)))]]))
|
||||
) vau]]
|
||||
|
||||
; eval should have it's parameters partially -evaled, then partially-eval e again.
|
||||
; failure can 'later at either point
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user