type_def variables and methods are not parsed in ast_transformation, and kind-of generated in c_generator, but access and whatnot not supported yet

This commit is contained in:
Nathan Braswell
2016-01-21 12:54:21 -05:00
parent c943d591e0
commit d43f36f1d9
4 changed files with 68 additions and 25 deletions

View File

@@ -34,6 +34,27 @@ obj c_generator (Object) {
var function_definitions: string = "\n/**Function Definitions**/\n"
var variable_declarations: string = "\n/**Variable Declarations**/\n"
// moved out from below so that it can be used for methods as well as regular functions (and eventually lambdas...)
var generate_function_definition = fun(child: *ast_node) {
var backing = child->function
var parameter_types = string()
var parameters = string()
var decorated_name = generate_function(child)
// also add in name decoration
backing.parameters.for_each(fun(parameter: *ast_node) {
if (parameter_types != "") { parameter_types += ", "; parameters += ", ";}
parameter_types += type_to_c(parameter->identifier.type)
parameters += type_to_c(parameter->identifier.type) + " " + parameter->identifier.name
})
function_prototypes += type_to_c(backing.type->return_type) + " " + decorated_name + "(" + parameter_types + ");\n"
// add parameters to destructor thingy (for returns)? Or should that be a different pass?
function_definitions += type_to_c(backing.type->return_type) + " " + decorated_name + "(" + parameters + ") {\n" + generate_statement(backing.body_statement)
// emit parameter destructors?
function_definitions += "}\n"
}
var type_poset = poset<*ast_node>()
// iterate through asts
name_ast_map.for_each(fun(name: string, tree_pair: pair<*tree<symbol>,*ast_node>) {
@@ -52,21 +73,7 @@ obj c_generator (Object) {
// make sure not a template
// or a passthrough
// check for and add to parameters if a closure
var parameter_types = string()
var parameters = string()
var decorated_name = generate_function(child)
// also add in name decoration
backing.parameters.for_each(fun(parameter: *ast_node) {
if (parameter_types != "") { parameter_types += ", "; parameters += ", ";}
parameter_types += type_to_c(parameter->identifier.type)
parameters += type_to_c(parameter->identifier.type) + " " + parameter->identifier.name
})
function_prototypes += type_to_c(backing.type->return_type) + " " + decorated_name + "(" + parameter_types + ");\n"
// add parameters to destructor thingy (for returns)? Or should that be a different pass?
function_definitions += type_to_c(backing.type->return_type) + " " + decorated_name + "(" + parameters + ") {\n" + generate_statement(backing.body_statement)
// emit parameter destructors?
function_definitions += "}\n"
generate_function_definition(child)
}
ast_node::type_def(backing) {
type_poset.add_vertex(child)
@@ -76,7 +83,11 @@ obj c_generator (Object) {
})
type_poset.get_sorted().for_each(fun(vert: *ast_node) {
plain_typedefs += string("typedef struct ") + vert->type_def.name + "_dummy " + vert->type_def.name + ";\n"
structs += string("struct ") + vert->type_def.name + "_dummy {};\n"
structs += string("struct ") + vert->type_def.name + "_dummy {\n"
vert->type_def.variables.for_each(fun(variable_declaration: *ast_node) structs += generate_declaration_statement(variable_declaration) + ";\n";)
structs += "};\n"
// generate the methods
vert->type_def.methods.for_each(fun(method: *ast_node) generate_function_definition(method);)
})
return make_pair(prequal+plain_typedefs+top_level_c_passthrough+variable_extern_declarations+structs+function_typedef_string_pre+function_typedef_string+function_prototypes+variable_declarations+function_definitions + "\n", linker_string)